Comments on: WATER HEATER: Return on Investment (ROI) on Tankless Water Heaters

By: Water heaters

Water heaters — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:00:06 +0000

It is not only that you are saving with tankless water heaters, but you are also protecting environment; less waste goes onto landfills, over 90% of elements are replaceable and recyclable. What about space and designated room? Tankless appliances are compact units, wall mounted that doesn’t require a designated room.

By: babylon 8 download

babylon 8 download — Wed, 19 May 2010 09:09:51 +0000

I see you are experinced webmaster, what is the best method to monetize my first blog ?

By: Go Tankless? - Gaiam Blog

Go Tankless? - Gaiam Blog — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:02:27 +0000

[...] GetWithGreen.com shows you how to calculate the return on your investment. [...]

By: Calculate the ROI for your own tankless water heater. : Windermere - Andrew Stone

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:46:30 +0000

[...] I didn’t have one until today. Over at getwithgreen.com they have just posted a very nice calculation model on tankless water heaters. I suggest that anyone considering a tankless water heater check it out. var ecov = “sh”; [...]

By: cheryl

cheryl — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:32:06 +0000

Dan, Yes , I gree with your comment, it seems it is the “holding cost” that would be the difference and the calculations given ccount for holding only the water used, not the 50 gal tank 24 hours per day, 365.
or 50x365x24 x the $.003 = $1314 per year for holding???
Can that be right? So that would be in favor of the tankless, but

Upon looking at the amount of water a tankless can heat I found it would take 5 $200+install units installed all over the house to have the same availability we now have.

Our house is long and the water runs for 80 feet to get to the master bath, so that amount of hot water is wasted each time we turn it on, and I thought to get a tankless for that end of the house, but found it would cost about $1000 to get what is needed for the back to back baths. I want to save energy, but that is too much $$$ for me.

By: Evan, US

Evan, US — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:08:38 +0000

No, Ben, you aren’t correct. Density of water changes by temperature (although by a small amount). Since water is measured in gallons(volume, not weight), and Density = Mass/Volume, if the Volume stays the same and the Density increases, the Mass increases.

It’s not like the old trick Question.

By: ben, uk

ben, uk — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:50:34 +0000

I cant see how a gallon of water would weigh less at different temperatures!

it s like the old trick Question, which weighs more, a pound of lead or a pound of feathers ?? its still a gallon of water either way unless you take it to the moon it won’t change weight!

By: Eric What about this?

Eric What about this? — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:59:21 +0000

Some more questions for Eric to think about:

Does 1 gallon of water weigh 8.34 pounds when it is 57F and 8.34 pounds at 110F? I think 1 gallon of water will weigh less as the temperature increases. What happens to your formula then?

By: Dan, Byron MN

Dan, Byron MN — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:28:33 +0000

I still think the numbers are bogus. The energy required to heat the water should be essentially the same in both cases — electric heat is 100% efficient. The only significant difference should be in standby losses, and, for the tank, they should be purely a function of time and temperature differential, not the amount of water used.

And somewhere it should be noted that the equations will shift significantly for gas units vs electric, since standby losses will be considerably higher.

By: WATER HEATERS: Does you wait longer for hot water when going tankless? | GetWithGreen.com

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:26:17 +0000

[...] The space savings will be a big draw for those of you living in smaller homes, and for some it will be the energy consumption of the tankless vs. a conventional model, or which one pays back faster? [...]